EAHIL Survey of European Health Information Professionals 2004 Results received from EAHIL-members
             
    Sunday, March 21, 2004  
Results Summary
Filter Results
To analyze a subset of your data,
you can create one or more filters.
   
Total:  346
Visible:  111
Share Results
Your results can be shared with others,
without giving access to your account.
   
Status:  Enabled
Reports:  Summary and Detail
2. Continuing education & professional development
1. Please indicate the primary areas in which you and/or your staff need continuing education. Check a maximum of 5.
  Response Percent Response Total
  Alternative health
4.5% 5
  Benchmarking
20.9% 23
  Budgeting
17.3% 19
  Business case preparation
10.9% 12
  Consumer health information
14.5% 16
  Copyright
26.4% 29
  Document delivery
11.8% 13
  Evidence-based health care
41.8% 46
  Evidence-based librarianship
40% 44
  Grant proposal writing
10% 11
  Hardware configuration & management
4.5% 5
  Knowledge management
40.9% 45
  Library advocacy
17.3% 19
  Licensing electronic information resources
35.5% 39
  Management
20.9% 23
  PubMed or NLM Gateway
11.8% 13
  Reference or research skills
26.4% 29
  Searching the Web effectively
37.3% 41
  Software applications
10% 11
  Subject-specific information resources
22.7% 25
  Technology support
9.1% 10
  Time management
9.1% 10
  User education
32.7% 36
  Web design or applications
22.7% 25
  No opinion
  0% 0
  Not applicable
  0% 0
  Other (please specify)
12.7% 14
Total Respondents   110
(filtered out)   233
(skipped this question)   3
2. Please indicate the level of support you receive from your employer for attendance at continuing education courses. Check as many as apply.
  Response Percent Response Total
  Paid leave of absence while attending courses
64.2% 70
  Full funding provided for course tuition
71.6% 78
  Partial funding provided for course tuition
5.5% 6
  Full travel funding provided for courses held outside your area
61.5% 67
  Partial travel funding provided for courses held outside your area
9.2% 10
  Funding / leave of absence only provided for courses held locally
7.3% 8
  No support provided
7.3% 8
  Not applicable
  0% 0
  Other (please specify)
7.3% 8
Total Respondents   109
(filtered out)   227
(skipped this question)   10
3. If you are provided partial funding of continuing education course tuition, please indicate the type of funding you receive.
  Response Percent Response Total
    A set percentage of the course tuition
9.1% 3
    A set sum limit on tuition
21.2% 7
    Not applicable
60.6% 20
  Other (please specify)
9.1% 3
Total Respondents   33
(filtered out)   98
(skipped this question)   215
4. Please indicate the level of support you receive from your employer for attendance at professional conferences (workshops). Check as many as apply.
  Response Percent Response Total
  Paid leave of absence while attending conferences
65.1% 71
  Full funding for conference registration
78% 85
  Partial funding for conference registration
6.4% 7
  Full travel funding to conferences outside your area
67% 73
  Partial travel funding to conference outside your area
8.3% 9
  Funding / leave of absence only available for locally held conferences
3.7% 4
  No support provided
3.7% 4
  No opinion
0.9% 1
  Not applicable
  0% 0
  Other (please specify)
11.9% 13
Total Respondents   109
(filtered out)   221
(skipped this question)   16
5. Please indicate how often you attend the annual EAHIL conference/workshop.
  Response Percent Response Total
    Every year
30.6% 34
    Every two or three years
30.6% 34
    Occasionally
18% 20
    Seldom
8.1% 9
    Never
12.6% 14
Total Respondents   111
(filtered out)   222
(skipped this question)   13
6. Please indicate the primary factors influencing your decision whether or not to attend the annual EAHIL conference/workshop. Check a maximum of 4.
  Response Percent Response Total
  Amount of time involved
16.2% 18
  Availability of institutional funding to attend
55.9% 62
  Continuing education courses being offered
12.6% 14
  Cost of accommodation
27.9% 31
  Cost of registration
21.6% 24
  Location – appealing
15.3% 17
  Location – cost of travel
43.2% 48
  Quality of scientific programme
59.5% 66
  Time of year
20.7% 23
  Whether you’re participating in the conference yourself (e.g. presenting a paper, poster)
23.4% 26
  No opinion
0.9% 1
  Not applicable
  0% 0
  Other (please specify)
9% 10
Total Respondents   111
(filtered out)   222
(skipped this question)   13
7. Please use this space to provide feedback on or suggestions for improvements to EAHIL conferences/workshops.